How, where, when, what?

The legal situation is diffuse in all countries, but I have not seen a law anywhere that would explicitly prohibit a clinic from leaving the choice of blood donor, or the type of donor blood, up to the patient. And we have hired several lawyers to help us find these laws – they have not found one.

There is no medical reason to use only Red Cross blood, or to deny you from bringing a potential blood donor with the appropriate blood type yourself. If your doctor tells you otherwise, he is lying or does not know better. To say that it is not feasible or recommended for a medical reason stamps all clinics and doctors who have always practiced this as unprofessional or idiots. In many parts of the third world, it is common for patients to be asked to bring a relative as a blood donor. It is a typical Western arrogance to think that only we here in the so-called West have a highly developed health care system. Countries like South Africa, for example, even have some of the best hospitals in the world.

Often, especially from German hospitals, arguments like “there may be psychological conflicts if you have the blood of a relative” or similar absurdities are used – all excuses to be able to maintain the status quo.

So there is actually no reason to deny you this basic right. Why do they do it then? We can only speculate here, since no one in charge will admit what it’s all about, namely a lot of money (the big big money), power, and pushing through an agenda that has brought us the last 2 years of “pandemic” with all its nonsensical, destructive and sometimes life-threatening consequences (e.g. vaccination side effects on a scale never seen before).

As an example of this agenda, here is a statement by Ann Bressington, former member of the Western Australian Legislative Council. An example from Australia, but one that can be applied 1:1 to virtually every country in the world. You can of course call this a “conspiracy theory” and ignore it, but there are dozens of such genuine statements (formerly disguised as “secret societies”, today easily found on the Internet) both from politicians and from the self-appointed leaders of this “New World Order” themselves, e.g. Klaus Schwab’s book “Covid 19: The great reset”.
https://safeblood.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ANN_Bressington.mp4

Insist on your human right, sue the clinic, find another one – do whatever it takes to prevent getting mRNA contaminated blood transfused. We’re on the front lines fighting for it. Starting in September, you will find a database of our Medical Partners in your member area – so you will be able to find a clinic online that will grant you your basic rights – but you will also see there which clinics will deny you that.

Because I refuse to go along with the whole vaccination fascism that is going on in the world at the moment. For me, vaccinated and unvaccinated people are first and foremost human beings, none more valuable than the other. Sure, we distinguish these two groups for purely medical reasons, because we don’t want vaccinated blood. And one may ask the question, whether it makes sense, if a vaccinated person wants unvaccinated blood.

We must not forget two things here: firstly, many people have only been vaccinated under inhuman pressure and would never do it again, and secondly, I am totally convinced, that the less graphene oxides and spike proteins you give your body, the better it is. No vaccination super, one vaccination better than two and so on. We are all just human and we make mistakes. I do not punish anyone for the mistake of being vaccinated, and if you think that vaccinated people have no place here, on the contrary, you are out of place here.

We are currently writing to all hospitals in all countries where we have members, to convince them to be part of a healthcare system that allows patients to choose their own blood donor.

The results will be put into a database (from mid September on) which will help you to find a hospital on our website that will allow you to choose your blood donor yourself. This is a HUGE effort, but never mind, the goal is, as always, the free choice of the blood donor anywhere and anytime.

The second step will be the establishment of a blood bank with blood reserves.

Update May 2024:

Ever since SafeBlood and Safereproduction were launched, we have been looking for an analysis that would allow us to determine whether blood for transfusion or a sperm donation comes from a vaccinated or unvaccinated donor. Until now, the selection of our donors has been based solely on the trust that our members will correctly declare their vaccination status. But now we finally have a blood analysis that allows us to determine the following:

1. Residues of any Covid19 vaccines
2. The presence of spike proteins
3. Whether the functionality of your RNA and DNA is disrupted or damaged

For me, the latter is the biggest sensation, because it shows whether there is a need for therapy and whether the mRNA injection has actually resulted in a significant impairment of your genetic material. We know that different batch numbers, e.g. in the Pfizer vaccinations, triggered very different side effects; from “placebo” with zero effect, to immediate death in the most dangerous batches.

Everything about the Covid19 Vaccine Residual Analysis can be found here.

Status before May 2024 and general information:

At the moment, microscopic examination of the blood by an experienced professional is the only method of determining blood showing effects of mRNA vaccination from normal blood. As we partner with laboratories and clinics we are seeking to make examination of donor blood available. Until then members may be able to arrange examination with local professionals in their area who offer Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) examination. 

Trust between the donor and recipient is necessary. Members requiring directed donation may be most comfortable first seeking donors from among family, friends, and other trust networks, for whom Safe Blood will facilitate the donation through medical providers.

We have high confidence in the integrity of our member donors. That said, in theory a “troll” or terrorist might seek to falsely pass him or herself off as unvaccinated. We believe that is a low-probability risk, especially compared the high probability of receiving mRNA-vaccinated blood through existing blood banks. 

In regard to the goal of creating an mRNA-vaccine-free blood bank, modern scientific methods have yet to develop a rapid test capable of differentiating between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood with one hundred percent accuracy necessary for that project. Until the science advances to achieve this technology such a blood bank is illusory. Fortunately, we have many scientists on our side (people like Prof. Bhakdi, Hockertz and many more) and they are working hard to get this done.

As an observational tool, DFM is one of several microscopy methods capable of detecting the effects of the spike protein in the blood subsequent to mRNA vaccination. Dark field microscopy is the tool of choice, with which the differences in the blood can be clearly visualized. This use is different that that of DFM as a tool for diagnosing specific diseases, which is not yet universally recognized by mainstream western medicine.

In other words, to operate a blood bank, will require widespread agreement regarding microscopy methods and standards that are currently in development. We will be able to provide this, but we still need time.